One of my biggest surprises is how wrong many of the answers given by official science are. They’re just flying by the seat of their pants to give an illusion of being all-knowing, and it’s a ridiculous conceit. In this article we'll look at contentious content in the fields of cosmology, cryogenics, Evolution, meteoritics and paleontology.
Okay: How do we tell if we're being fed a line, by experts or so-called experts, to do something against our interests, and what does this have to do with science? And how is it, if we don't know a little about science, we end up getting the shaft? If science is misunderstood, that can only be through intent. Science itself is pretty simple and something everyone participates in every day -- making hypotheses -- or guesses, testing things and whatnot. But after a little study, it may look like today's "science" is just the poorly-coordinated mishmash left after tribal consensus and censorship within the "scientific community."